Integration patterns

Choose hosted checkout, embedded UI or direct API orchestration.

Match the integration model to your UX ownership, security boundary, engineering capacity and time to market.

Discuss this solution

PayDrion Integration chooser Three integration patterns

Illustrative product operating view Hosted, embedded or API-led—matched to ownership.

PayDrion Core Policy · events · evidence

01 Hosted checkout

02 Embedded modules

03 Direct API

04 Webhooks

Boundary mapped Pattern selected Launch planned

Integration architecture

The best integration is the one whose responsibility boundary is understood.

PayDrion helps teams choose the right balance of UX control, security scope, engineering effort and launch speed.

Hosted

Redirect to a PayDrion-controlled payment surface and receive the final context.

Embedded

Use branded components while retaining more of the merchant page experience.

API-led

Orchestrate eligible flows server-side where the programme and controls permit it.

Integration architecture

The best integration is the one whose responsibility boundary is understood.

PayDrion helps teams choose the right balance of UX control, security scope, engineering effort and launch speed.

Integration patternsDedicated product layer · shared PayDrion evidence model

PayDrion product architecture Three integration patterns

Hosted checkout Redirect to a PayDrion-controlled payment surface and receive the final context.

Boundary mapped

Embedded modules Use branded components while retaining more of the merchant page experience.

Pattern selected

Direct API Orchestrate eligible flows server-side where the programme and controls permit it.

Launch planned

Webhooks Redirect to a PayDrion-controlled payment surface and receive the final context.

Boundary mapped

PayDrion evidence lineRequest · decision · partner reference · signed event · operator action

Test-mode examples

Stable identifiers. Explicit states. Safer retries.

The examples demonstrate the intended integration pattern; endpoint availability and credentials follow successful onboarding.

Bearer credentials scoped by environment
Idempotency on money-moving requests
Signed webhooks as asynchronous evidence

PayDrion test environment Example ready

POST /v1/payment-orders

curl --request POST https://api.paydrion.com/v1/payment-orders \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer <test_key>" \
  --header "Idempotency-Key: order_20481" \
  --header "Content-Type: application/json" \
  --data '{
    "amount": 249900,
    "currency": "INR",
    "reference": "ORDER-20481",
    "customer": {"email": "customer@example.com"}
  }'

Questions

Practical answers before implementation.

Commercial and technical details are confirmed for the specific entity, use case and approved programme.

How does implementation begin?+

PayDrion first maps your business model, transaction flow, expected volumes, risk profile and required payment rails. An implementation plan and test credentials follow successful onboarding.

Can this be enabled for every business?+

Availability, limits, pricing and settlement timelines depend on onboarding, use case, bank or network partner approval, and applicable regulation.

How are transaction states confirmed?+

Use the synchronous API response for immediate context, then rely on signed webhooks and server-side status verification as the operational source of truth.

Choose hosted checkout, embedded UI or direct API orchestration.

The best integration is the one whose responsibility boundary is understood.

Hosted

Embedded

API-led

The best integration is the one whose responsibility boundary is understood.

Stable identifiers. Explicit states. Safer retries.

Practical answers before implementation.

Related PayDrion capabilities.

Payment APIs that behave consistently under pressure.

Understand the request, response and event contract.

Practical guides for reliable payment operations.